# No Nonzero Zero Divisor in a Field / Direct Product of Rings is Not a Field

## Problem 531

(a) Let $F$ be a field. Show that $F$ does not have a nonzero zero divisor.

(b) Let $R$ and $S$ be nonzero rings with identities.
Prove that the direct product $R\times S$ cannot be a field.

Sponsored Links

## Proof.

### (a) Show that $F$ does not have a nonzero zero divisor.

Seeking a contradiction, suppose that $x$ is a nonzero zero divisor of the field $F$. This means that there exists a nonzero element $y\in F$ such that
$yx=0.$ Since $y$ is a nonzero element in $F$, we have the inverse $y^{-1}$ in $F$.

Hence we have
\begin{align*}
0=y^{-1}\cdot 0=y^{-1}(yx)=(y^{-1}y)x=x.
\end{align*}
This is a contradiction because $x$ is a nonzero element.

We conclude that the field $F$ does not have a nonzero zero divisor.

(Remark that it follows that a field is an integral domain.)

### (b) Prove that the direct product $R\times S$ cannot be a field.

Since $R$ and $S$ have identities, the direct product $R\times S$ contains nonzero elements $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$.

The product of these elements is
$(1,0)\cdot (0,1)=(1\cdot 0, \, 0\cdot 1)=(0,0).$ Similarly we also have
$(0,1)\cdot (1,0)=(0,0).$

It follows that $(1,0)$ is a nonzero zero divisor of $R\times S$. By part (a), a field does not have a nonzero zero divisor.
Hence $R\times S$ is never a field.

Sponsored Links

### More from my site

#### You may also like...

##### Every Prime Ideal is Maximal if $a^n=a$ for any Element $a$ in the Commutative Ring

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with identity $1\neq 0$. Suppose that for each element $a\in R$, there exists an...

Close