Rings $2\Z$ and $3\Z$ are Not Isomorphic

Problems and solutions of ring theory in abstract algebra

Problem 170

Prove that the rings $2\Z$ and $3\Z$ are not isomorphic.
 
LoadingAdd to solve later

Sponsored Links


Definition of a ring homomorphism.

Let $R$ and $S$ be rings.

  • A homomorphism is a map $f:R\to S$ satisfying
    1. $f(a+b)=f(a)+f(b)$ for all $a, b \in R$, and
    2. $f(ab)=f(a)f(b)$ for all $a, b \in R$.
  • A bijective ring homomorphism is called an isomorphism.
  • If there is an isomorphism from $R$ to $S$, then we say that rings $R$ and $S$ are isomorphic (as rings).

Proof.

Suppose that the rings are isomorphic. Then we have a ring isomorphism
\[f:2\Z \to 3\Z.\] Let us put $f(2)=3a$ for some integer $a$. Then we compute $f(4)$ in two ways.
First we have
\[f(4)=f(2+2)=f(2)+f(2)=3a+3a=6a.\]

Next we have
\[f(4)=f(2\cdot 2)=f(2)\cdot f(2)=3a\cdot 3a=9a^2.\] These are equal and hence we have
\[6a=9a^2.\] The only integer solution is $a=0$.

But then we have $f(0)=0=f(2)$, which contradicts that $f$ is an isomorphism (hence in particular injective).
Therefore, there is no such isomorphism $f$, thus the rings $2\Z$ and $3\Z$ are not isomorphic.


LoadingAdd to solve later

Sponsored Links

More from my site

You may also like...

Please Login to Comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.