Differentiating Linear Transformation is Nilpotent

Linear Transformation problems and solutions

Problem 453

Let $P_n$ be the vector space of all polynomials with real coefficients of degree $n$ or less.
Consider the differentiation linear transformation $T: P_n\to P_n$ defined by
\[T\left(\, f(x) \,\right)=\frac{d}{dx}f(x).\]

(a) Consider the case $n=2$. Let $B=\{1, x, x^2\}$ be a basis of $P_2$. Find the matrix representation $A$ of the linear transformation $T$ with respect to the basis $B$.

(b) Compute $A^3$, where $A$ is the matrix obtained in part (a).

(c) If you computed $A^3$ in part (b) directly, then is there any theoretical explanation of your result?

(d) Now we consider the general case. Let $B$ be any basis of the vector space of $P_n$ and let $A$ be the matrix representation of the linear transformation $T$ with respect to the basis $B$.
Prove that without any calculation that the matrix $A$ is nilpotent.

 
LoadingAdd to solve later

Sponsored Links


 

Background.

Differentiating is a linear transformation.

Recall that differentiating a polynomial is a linear transformation.

See the post “Differentiation is a linear transformation” for a proof.

The post also contains a similar problem for $n=3$.

Definition (Nilpotent matrix).

A square matrix $A$ is called nilpotent if there exists a positive integer $k$ such that $A^k=O$, the zero matrix.
 

Solution.

(a) Find the matrix representation $A$ of the linear transformation $T$ with respect to the basis $B$.

To find the matrix representation $A$ of $T$, we first find the coordinate vectors as follows.
Since we have
\begin{align*}
T(1)&=0=0\cdot 1+0\cdot x+0\cdot x^2\\
T(x)&=1=1\cdot 1+0\cdot x+0\cdot x^2\\
T(x^2)&=2x=0\cdot 1+2\cdot x+0\cdot x^2
\end{align*}
we have the coordinate vectors of these with respect to the basis $B$ is
\begin{align*}
[T(1)]_B=\begin{bmatrix}
0 \\
0 \\
0
\end{bmatrix}, \quad
[T(x)]_B=\begin{bmatrix}
1 \\
0 \\
0
\end{bmatrix}, \quad
[T(x^2)]_B=\begin{bmatrix}
0 \\
2 \\
0
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{align*}
Hence the matrix representation $A$ of $T$ is
\begin{align*}
A=\begin{bmatrix}
\,[T(1)]_B & [T(x)]_B & [T(x^2)]_B \,\\
\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 &0 &2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{align*}

 

(b) Compute $A^3$, where $A$ is the matrix obtained in part (a).

We calculate
\begin{align*}
A^2&=\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 &0 &2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 &0 &2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 2 \\
0 &0 &0 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix} \text{ and },\\[6pt] A^3&=A^2A=
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 2 \\
0 &0 &0 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 &0 &2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 &0 &0 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{align*}
Thus, $A^3$ is the zero matrix.

 

(c) Is there any theoretical explanation of your result?

Recall from calculus that differentiating a polynomial once lowers the degree by one. Thus if we differentiate a degree $2$ polynomial once, then you get a degree $1$ polynomial. If we apply the differentiation again, we obtain a degree $0$ polynomial, which is a constant. If we differentiate once more, it becomes the zero polynomial.

Hence differentiating a polynomial of degree $2$ or less three times, the polynomial becomes the zero polynomial.

Differentiating once is the linear transformation $T$, hence multiplying by $A$ corresponds to differentiating once.
Therefore, $A^3$ corresponds to differentiating three times.
This is why $A^3$ is the zero matirx.

 

(d) Prove that without any calculation that the matrix $A$ is nilpotent.

We generalize the argument in part (c) to any positive integer $n$. Recall again differentiating a polynomial once lowers the degree by one.
Thus, if we differentiate a degree $n$ polynomial $n+1$ times, then the polynomial becomes the zero polynomial.

In other words, we have
\[T^{n+1}\left(\, f(x) \,\right)=0\] for any $f(x)\in P_n$.
Thus we have $T^{n+1}$ is the zero linear transformation.

In terms of the matrix representation, this means that we have $A^{n+1}=O$, the zero matrix.


LoadingAdd to solve later

Sponsored Links

More from my site

You may also like...

2 Responses

  1. 06/13/2017

    […] out the post “Differentiating Linear Transformation is Nilpotent” for an […]

  2. 06/13/2017

    […] out the post “Differentiating Linear Transformation is Nilpotent” for problems and solutions about the nilpotency of the differentiation linear […]

Please Login to Comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More in Linear Algebra
Linear algebra problems and solutions
Eigenvalues of Similarity Transformations

Let $A$ be an $n\times n$ complex matrix. Let $S$ be an invertible matrix. (a) If $SAS^{-1}=\lambda A$ for some...

Close