<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elementary number theory &#8211; Problems in Mathematics</title>
	<atom:link href="https://yutsumura.com/tag/elementary-number-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://yutsumura.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 01:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.3.6</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">114989322</site>	<item>
		<title>Even Perfect Numbers and Mersenne Prime Numbers</title>
		<link>https://yutsumura.com/even-perfect-numbers-and-mersenne-prime-numbers/</link>
				<comments>https://yutsumura.com/even-perfect-numbers-and-mersenne-prime-numbers/#comments</comments>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yu]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elementary Number Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elementary number theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euclid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[even perfect number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mersenne number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mersenne prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odd perfect number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sum of divisors function]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://yutsumura.com/?p=3351</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>Prove that if $2^n-1$ is a Mersenne prime number, then \[N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)\] is a perfect number. On the other hand, prove that every even perfect number $N$ can be written as $N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)$ for some Mersenne&#46;&#46;&#46;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://yutsumura.com/even-perfect-numbers-and-mersenne-prime-numbers/" target="_blank">Even Perfect Numbers and Mersenne Prime Numbers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://yutsumura.com/" target="_blank">Problems in Mathematics</a>.</p>]]></description>
								<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2> Problem 496</h2>
<p>Prove that if $2^n-1$ is a Mersenne prime number, then<br />
\[N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)\]
 is a perfect number.</p>
<p>On the other hand, prove that every even perfect number $N$ can be written as $N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)$ for some Mersenne prime number $2^n-1$.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<span id="more-3351"></span><br />

<h2>Definitions.</h2>
<p>In this post, a divisor of a positive integer means a positive divisor.</p>
<h3>The Sum of Divisors Function $\sigma(n)$</h3>
<p>For a positive integer $n$, we denote by $\sigma(n)$ the sum of all divisors of $n$.<br />
(We call $\sigma$ <strong>the sum of the divisors function</strong>.)</p>
<p>For example, consider the number $12$.<br />
 The divisors of $12$ are $1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12$.</p>
<p>Thus, the sum of the divisors of $12$ is<br />
\[\sigma(12)=1+2+3+4+6+12=28.\]
<h3>Perfect Numbers</h3>
<p>A positive integer $n$ is called a <strong>perfect number</strong> if the sum of all proper divisors are $n$ itself.<br />
Here, a proper divisor of $n$ means a divisor of $n$ that is not $n$ itself.</p>
<p>Alternatively and equivalently, we can define a perfect number to be a positive integer $n$ such that the sum of all divisors of $n$ (including $n$ itself) is $2n$.</p>
<p>In terms of the function $\sigma(n)$, an integer $n$ is a perfect number if $\sigma(n)=2n$.</p>
<h4>Examples of Perfect Numbers</h4>
<p>For example, the number $6$ is the first perfect number.</p>
<p>In fact, the proper divisors of $6$ are $1, 2, 3$ and their sum is $1+2+3=6$.<br />
We also can use the second equivalent definition to check that $6$ is a perfect number.<br />
We have<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(6)=1+2+3+6=12=2\cdot 6.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>The next perfect number is $28$.<br />
To see this, we find the divisors of $28$ and sum them up, and we have<br />
\[\sigma(28)=1+2+4+7+14+28=56=2\cdot 28.\]
<p>(Wait, did you notice that this problem is posted on June 28th?<br />
I propose to call June 28th <strong>Perfect Number Day</strong> or simply <strong>Perfect Day</strong>.)</p>
<p>Can you find the next perfect number?</p>
<p>I give you a hint: Look at the problem number of this post.</p>
<div class="su-spacer" style="height:50px"></div>
<p>Yes, the third perfect number is <div class="su-spoiler su-spoiler-style-default su-spoiler-icon-plus su-spoiler-closed" data-scroll-offset="0" data-anchor-in-url="no"><div class="su-spoiler-title" tabindex="0" role="button"><span class="su-spoiler-icon"></span>The Third Perfect Number</div><div class="su-spoiler-content su-u-clearfix su-u-trim">$496$!!</div></div>
<h2>Unsolved Problems in Number Theory </h2>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
It is an open problem in mathematics whether there are infinitely many perfect numbers or not.
</div>
<p>All the perfect numbers people have found so far are all even numbers.</p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
It is another unsolved problem whether there exists an odd perfect number.
</div>
<p>According to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>, 49 Mersenne primes are known as of January 2016.</p>
<p>Even though we don&#8217;t know whether there are infinitely even perfect numbers, we do know how they should look like thanks to the great mathematician Euclid and Euler.</p>
<p>This is the problem of this post.</p>
<h3>Mersenne Prime Numbers</h3>
<p>A number of the form $2^n-1$ is called a <strong>Mersenne number</strong>.<br />
The first few Mersenne numbers are $1, 3, 7, 15, 31$, corresponding to $n=1, 2, 3, 4, 5$.</p>
<p>As you can see from these examples, not all Mersenne numbers are prime numbers.<br />
If a Mersenne number is a prime number, then we call it a <strong>Mersenne prime number</strong>.</p>
<p>Thus $2^2-1=3, 2^3-1=7, 2^5-1=31$ are examples of Mersenne prime numbers, but $2^4-1=15=3\cdot 5$ is not a Mersenne prime number.</p>
<p>The problem claims that:</p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
If $2^n-1$ is a Mersenne prime number, then the number $N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)$ is a perfect number (Euclid proved this part).<br />
Conversely, if $N$ is an even perfect number, then there is a Mersenne number $2^n-1$ such that $N=2^{n-1}(2^n-1)$ (Euler proved this part).
</div>
<p>Thus, even perfect numbers and Mersenne prime numbers are one-to-one correspondence: If you find one, then you find the other.</p>
<p>As we said earlier, we don&#8217;t know whether there are infinitely many perfect numbers.<br />
Thus, we also don&#8217;t know whether there are infinitely many Mersenne prime numbers.</p>
<h2>Properties of the Sum of Divisors Function $\sigma$ </h2>
<p>To prove the problem, let us first study the sum of divisors function $\sigma(n)$.</p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<strong>Theorem</strong>.	Let $n=p_1^{a_1}\dots p_k^{a_k}$ be the prime factorization of a positive integer $n$, where $p_1, \dots, p_n$ are pairwise distinct prime numbers, and $a_1, \dots, a_k$ are positive integers.<br />
	Then the sum of all the divisors of $n$ is given by the formula<br />
	\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(n)&#038;=(1+p_1+p_1^2+\cdots+p_1^{a_1})\cdots (1+p_k+p_k^2+\cdots+p_k^{a_k})\\[6pt]
&#038;=\frac{p_1^{a_1+1}-1}{p_1-1}\cdots \frac{p_k^{a_k+1}-1}{p_k-1}.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>Using the product symbol $\prod$, we can write it concisely as<br />
\[\sigma(n)=\prod_{i=1}^k \frac{p^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1}.\]
</p></div>
<h4>Example How to Use the Formula</h4>
<p>Before the proof of Theorem, let us give an example to illustrate how to use the formula in Theorem.<br />
Consider $24$.<br />
The prime factorization is $24=2^3\cdot 3$.<br />
Thus, by Theorem the sum of the divisors of $24$ is<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(24)&#038;=\frac{2^{3+1}-1}{2-1}\cdot \frac{3^{1+1}-1}{3-1}\\<br />
&#038;=15\cdot 4 =60.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>Just to make sure, let us list divisors of $24$:</p>
<p>\[1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24\]
<p>and it is checked that the sum of these divisors is $60$ and it (of course) coincides with the result we obtained using Theorem.</p>
<h3>Proof of Theorem</h3>
<p>From the prime factorization $n=p_1^{a_1}\dots p_k^{a_k}$, every divisor of $n$ is of the form<br />
\[n=p_1^{b_1}\dots p_k^{b_k},\]
where $0 \leq b_i \leq a_i$ for $i=1, \dots, k$.</p>
<p>If the product<br />
\[(1+p_1+p_1^2+\cdots+p_1^{a_1})\cdots (1+p_k+p_k^2+\cdots+p_k^{a_k})\]
is expanded, then this becomes some of<br />
\[n=p_1^{b_1}\dots p_k^{b_k},\]
where each $b_i$ runs from $0$ to $a_k$.<br />
Thus, it is the sum of the divisors of $n$.<br />
This proves the first equality in the formula.</p>
<p>By the formula for a geometric series, we have<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
1+p_i+p_i^2+\cdots+p_i^{a_i}=\frac{p^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1}.<br />
\end{align*}<br />
This yields the second equality.<br />
This completes the proof of Theorem.</p>
<hr />
<p>As a corollary of this theorem, we see that the sum of the divisors function $\sigma(n)$ is multiplicative. </p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
<strong>Corollary</strong>.	Suppose that $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime positive integers.<br />
	Then we have<br />
	\[\sigma(mn)=\sigma(m)\sigma(n).\]
</div>
<h3>Proof of Corollary</h3>
<p>Let<br />
\[m=p_1^{a_1}\dots p_k^{a_k} \text{ and } n=q_1^{b_1}\dots q_l^{b_l}\]
be the prime factorizations of $m$ and $n$.<br />
Since $m$ and $n$ are relatively prime, each pair of $p_i$ and $q_j$ is distinct.<br />
Thus,<br />
\[nm=p_1^{a_1}\dots p_k^{a_k}q_1^{b_1}\dots q_l^{b_l}\]
is the prime factorization of $mn$.</p>
<p>By the theorem above, we have<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(m)=\prod_{i=1}^k \frac{p^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1}\\[6pt]
\sigma(n)=\prod_{i=1}^l \frac{q^{b_i+1}-1}{q_i-1}<br />
\end{align*}<br />
and thus we have<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(m)\sigma(n)=\prod_{i=1}^k \frac{p^{a_i+1}-1}{p_i-1}\cdot \prod_{i=1}^l \frac{q^{b_i+1}-1}{q_i-1}=\sigma(mn),<br />
\end{align*}<br />
where the second equality also follows from the theorem above.<br />
This completes the proof of Corollary.</p>
<hr />
<h2>Proof of the Problem about Perfect Numbers and Mersenne Prime Numbers </h2>
<h3>If $2^n-1$ is a Mersenne Prime, then $2^{n-1}(2^n-1)$ is a Perfect Number</h3>
<p>	Suppose that $p:=2^n-1$ is a Mersenne prime number.<br />
	Then the sum of the divisors of $N=2^{n-1}p$ is<br />
	\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(N)&#038;=\sigma(2^{n-1}p)\\<br />
&#038;=(1+2+2^2+\cdots+2^{n-2}+2^{n-1})(1+p) &#038;&#038; \text{by Theorem}\\<br />
&#038;=(2^n-1)2^n\\<br />
&#038;=2\cdot 2^{n-1}(2^n-1)\\<br />
&#038;=2N.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>Therefore, the number $N$ is a perfect number.</p>
<h3>If $N$ is an even perfect number, then $N=2^{n-1}(2^{n}-1)$ with Mersenne Prime $2^{n}-1$.</h3>
<p>Suppose now that $N$ is an even perfect number.<br />
Since $N$ is even, we can write<br />
\[N=2^am\]
for some positive integers $a$ and an odd integer $m$. </p>
<p>Since $N$ is a perfect number, we have<br />
\[\sigma(N)=2N=2^{a+1}m.\]
We compute<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(N)&#038;=\sigma(2^a)\sigma(m) &#038;&#038;\text{by Corollary}\\<br />
&#038;=(2^{a+1}-1)\sigma(m) &#038;&#038;\text{by Theorem}.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>Hence we have<br />
\[2^{a+1}m=(2^{a+1}-1)\sigma(m).\]
<p>Solving this to $\sigma(m)$, it yields that<br />
\begin{align*}<br />
\sigma(m)&#038;=\frac{2^{a+1}m}{2^{a+1}-1}\\[6pt]
&#038;=\frac{(2^{a+1}-1+1)m}{2^{a+1}-1}\\[6pt]
&#038;=m+\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1}.<br />
\end{align*}</p>
<p>As both $\sigma(m)$ and $m$ are integers, so is $\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1}$.<br />
Since $a > 0$, the denominator $2^{a+1}-1 > 1$.<br />
Hence $\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1}$ is a proper divisor of $m$.</p>
<p>Now observe the equality we obtained above again:<br />
\[\sigma(m)=m+\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1}.\]
The left hand side $\sigma(m)$ is the sum of all the divisors of $m$.<br />
The right hand side is the sum of two divisors of $m$: $m$ itself and $\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1}$.</p>
<p>It follows that $m$ has only two divisors, and we must have<br />
\[1=\frac{m}{2^{a+1}-1},\]
or equivalently<br />
\[m=2^{a+1}-1.\]
<p>The only integers that have exactly two divisors are prime numbers.<br />
Thus, $m$ is a prime number, and it is of the form $m=2^{a+1}-1$.<br />
Therefore $m$ is a Mersenne prime number, and the even perfect number $N$ can be written as<br />
\[N=2^am=2^a(2^{a+1}-1)\]
with Mersenne prime $m=2^{a+1}-1$ as required.</p>
<p>This completes the proof of the problem.</p>
<h2>The Largest Perfect Number </h2>
<p>The largest Perfect Number we know is</p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
\[2^{74207280} (2^{74207281}-1) \]</div>
<p>with 44,677,235 digits.</p>
<p>By Problem, we know that</p>
<div style="padding: 16px; border: none 3px #4169e1; border-radius: 10px; background-color: #f0f8ff; margin-top: 30px; margin-bottom: 30px;">
\[2^{74207281}-1\]
</div>
<p>is the largest Mersenne prime number we know.</p>
<p>(Reference: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>)</p>
<h2>Comments </h2>
<p>I&#8217;m happy that I could post the 496th article about perfect numbers on the Perfect Day June 28th, 2017.</p>
<p>Is 2017 a perfect number?</p>
<p>No!! But <a href="//yutsumura.com/mathematics-about-the-number-2017/" target="_blank">2017 is a prime number</a>!!</p>
<button class="simplefavorite-button has-count" data-postid="3351" data-siteid="1" data-groupid="1" data-favoritecount="28" style="">Click here if solved <i class="sf-icon-star-empty"></i><span class="simplefavorite-button-count" style="">28</span></button><p>The post <a href="https://yutsumura.com/even-perfect-numbers-and-mersenne-prime-numbers/" target="_blank">Even Perfect Numbers and Mersenne Prime Numbers</a> first appeared on <a href="https://yutsumura.com/" target="_blank">Problems in Mathematics</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
							<wfw:commentRss>https://yutsumura.com/even-perfect-numbers-and-mersenne-prime-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
						<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3351</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
